Finding Dory vs. Finding Nemo: Does the sequel compare?

With many new competitors in the world of animation, Disney and Pixar animation studios have scheduled a line-up of many future movies that continue the stories of beloved franchises under the company’s title to help conquer the competition. Rather than spend all of their time creating new worlds and characters to explore, the company believes that the key to success may be within the past.

In the hopes of making a profit and to justify the superiority of Disney films, numerous sequels and spin-off movies have been planned for the near future; this has created somewhat of a division among true fans as Disney has had a mixed bag in terms of worthy sequels in the far and recent past.

“Finding Dory,” the sequel to the famous “Finding Nemo” made thirteen years prior, begins a string of sequel films for the company on a very positive note that captures the true grandeur of the company and proves how special a Disney/Pixar film can be.

The newest additions features an incredibly strong range of actors and characters, and an amazing display of visual animation that will impress both adults and children alike. Also, scattered easter eggs and a few touching moments enhance the plot, making it one of Disney/Pixar’s most outstanding films.

Although “Finding Dory” works as a film by itself, does it compare to the film it follows? The answer can be decided by looking into “Finding Nemo” to see which main fish character carried the better film.

“Finding Nemo” has a respectable range of actors that deliver fitting voice performances, including Alexander Gould as Nemo, Albert Brooks as Marlin, and Ellen DeGeneres as Dory. Main characters Nemo and Marlin are relatable and effectively able to appeal to the audience, as they offer an engaging past and a bond that is interesting to watch. Where the film shines is in the overwhelming and impressive cast of supporting characters, (especially Dory), that offer a needed variety in the adventure and introduce great comedic opportunities.

In comparison, “Finding Dory” has many returning voice actors as well as many new actors, once again including characters such as Dory, Marlin, and Nemo, and newcomers Ed O’Neill as Hank and Kaitlin Olson as Destiny. Surprisingly, the supporting character of Dory effectively works as a main character, as the impressive comedy and interaction with others is a refreshing change in a world of many serious characters. Supporting characters are once again a strong point of the film and may work better than its predecessor, as returning characters and new characters, (especially Hank), have a true impact on the film and add to the film’s heart.

The plots of both films feel very familiar and somewhat simple, but ultimately do not detract from the experience, as simple is all that is needed. In this sequel, Dory must find her parents to reveal the truth about her past and to once again find her true home. “Finding Nemo” offers heartfelt moments and a feeling of wonder. while “Finding Dory” has more suspenseful moments and interesting character arcs, but both plots are structured by classic chance moments and last-minute plans.

Comparing both films in terms of visual style shows how far Disney/Pixar has become. “Finding Nemo” has a classic art and animation style that makes it feel both current and dated, although “Finding Dory” has visuals that go beyond beautiful and continue the art style in a cleaner and more fluid way.

When comparing these two films, it can be hard to pick a film that is truly superior. This shows how successful the Disney team is, being that the sequel, was a box-office success.  If continued like this, the future will be profitable for Disney and will continue their legend of truly outstanding films.

Overall, “Finding Dory” was a fantastic film in and of itself and a sensational sequel to the original that begins a new era for Disney/Pixar with fantastic characters, compelling stories, and some truly amazing visuals that take animation to the next level.

5.00 avg. rating (92% score) - 1 vote